-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/63859/#review192435
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp
Lines 343-348 (original), 343-348 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63859/#comment270580>

    :/ I'd really like to fix whatever code is using these signals for logic. I 
feel like the defining the signals for Windows was originally a band-aid, and 
understand this patch didn't add them.
    
    The funny thing is that, since these values aren't defined on Windows, they 
could be any number so long as only the symbol is used in the rest of the code 
base. I think this is why this worked anyway.
    
    Akash, what bug did you run into that required correcting these?
    
    (And indeed, they now appear correct. SIGKILL is 9, SIGCONT is 18 in 
decimal, and SIGSTOP is 19 in decimal).



3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp
Lines 376-377 (original), 376-378 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/63859/#comment270581>

    I wish I had context as to why this was a bitmask originally... I'll do a 
git blame and see what I can dig up.


- Andrew Schwartzmeyer


On Nov. 27, 2017, 9:36 a.m., Akash Gupta wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/63859/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 27, 2017, 9:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer and John Kordich.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7342
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7342
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Also fixed the WEXITSTATUS macro to cast the exit code instead of
> bit-masking it, since Windows exit codes are 32 bit unsigned ints.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/windows.hpp 
> 7aa0ba72c4cc3b688ce6374b3308945ea8cb7572 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/63859/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/63862/ for test results.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Akash Gupta
> 
>

Reply via email to