-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/#review192563
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





docs/task-state-reasons.md
Lines 476 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/#comment270801>

    What is the `/written` part about? `overwritten` covers all cases?



docs/task-state-reasons.md
Lines 477 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/#comment270805>

    Given the discussion in /r/64098/, here perhaps add another `Note: Due to 
garbage collection of the unreachable and gone agents in the registry, Mesos 
also sends such status updates for agents unknown to the master`.



docs/task-state-reasons.md
Lines 478 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/#comment270804>

    Should there be a `</td></tr>`?
    
    Also when it involves doc changes, could you in the testing done section 
mention that you have used a markdown viewer to review the doc change?


- Jiang Yan Xu


On Dec. 1, 2017, 1:06 p.m., Megha Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 1, 2017, 1:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ilya Pronin, James Peach, and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added new reasons `REASON_SLAVE_REREGISTERED` and
> `REASON_AGENT_REREGISTERED` for v0 and v1 task status update.
> The new reason will be used when master starts to send status
> update during the re-registeration of an agent which was
> previosuly removed by the master because of being unreachable.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/task-state-reasons.md 07f7927e28fe5624a6c9b74de731483aaa729ca3 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 11089b7d6f48f001ae64e8b0c67a2732684aa2fa 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto c496da927903f472c78d455b7fdf886d8fb692c4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64250/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> with make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Megha Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to