-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65936/#review198844
-----------------------------------------------------------




3rdparty/stout/include/stout/internal/windows/reparsepoint.hpp
Lines 192-199 (original), 192-199 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/65936/#comment279091>

    Adding here just so we remember:
    
    Let's add a regression test around `os::realpath` where we open a writable 
handle to file, and then call `os::realpath`.


- Andrew Schwartzmeyer


On March 7, 2018, 10:24 a.m., John Kordich wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65936/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2018, 10:24 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Akash Gupta, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Jeff Coffler, 
> and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8646
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8646
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changed flags to CreateFile to support Windows symlink path resolution.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/stout/include/stout/internal/windows/reparsepoint.hpp 
> 858b3c7c27e95b9cf46a7457c1aaa05a0e19188d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65936/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I encountered a permissions error stating "The process cannot access the file 
> because it is being used by another process." when attempting to download 
> stderr/stdout from a task running on a Windows agent, or when attempting to 
> download the mesos agent log on a Windows agent. 
> 
> After some very helpful information from Andy and Akash, I made this change 
> and confirmed it fixed this issue with the task/agent logs.
> 
> I also ran the automated tests on Windows and all tests pass.
> 
> I did not test this on Linux, but because this file is compiled only on 
> Windows, it shouldn't be necessary.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Kordich
> 
>

Reply via email to