-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67987/#review206263
-----------------------------------------------------------



The patch seems to not contain `3rdparty/rapidjson-1.1.0.tar.gz`. Are you 
running into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3906? If yes, could 
you try to upload the patch again after applying haosdent's fix?

- Benjamin Bannier


On July 20, 2018, 5:38 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67987/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 20, 2018, 5:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Benno Evers, and James Peach.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9092
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9092
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This includes a stripped bundle of the latest release. Stripping
> is required for licensing (see rapidjson.md), but also helps reduce
> the bloat in the mesos git repo.
> 
> Also included is a readme for how to update the dependency.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt b58996d2ed7521e42d6298d174cc8c494b84eb8f 
>   3rdparty/Makefile.am 6123b8a0164d50f0bd771d2e5f485379811e7fcb 
>   3rdparty/README.md fa9a6483ca2dc4980767a2cb723d654e342e6bb8 
>   3rdparty/cmake/Versions.cmake 0a897d808cd9e05ac0d1a4e1ca61b8f3538f0c4a 
>   3rdparty/rapidjson-1.1.0.tar.gz PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/rapidjson.md PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/versions.am 57792800c4b4b67dd55a316ce00480db6c253d34 
>   configure.ac e86c496140ee9732ad3204ef22ae8ce60cd5c079 
>   src/Makefile.am ecb95ef152fd37e5e83c4f6415489f4cf3959578 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67987/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested at the end of this chain, since this is split across 
> stout/libprocess/mesos.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to