-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69369/#review210624
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/master.hpp
Lines 2362 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69369/#comment295358>

    Please include <algorithm>


- Alexander Rukletsov


On Nov. 18, 2018, 1:25 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69369/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2018, 1:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Alexander Rojas, and Benjamin 
> Bannier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9317
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9317
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds the helper function 'collectAuthorizations' to master.hpp. This
> function allows for a simple way to collect authorization futures and
> only if all supplied futures result in an approved authorization will
> the returned future return true.
> 
> All identified areas that were formally triggering MESOS-9317 are
> being updated to make use of this new helper.
> 
> A helper function has been chosen and preferred over copying this
> pattern into the areas that needed a fix to allow for an efficient and
> complete test coverage.
> 
> Additionally we are adding a test validating that new helper.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp e77babf22126838c63cd05e483875c9beb3ac5ff 
>   src/master/master.cpp 1e326ec42a7f79a0835529a4655e7ec272f1cf40 
>   src/master/weights_handler.cpp 222ec754e216da195250d1895a728294a076ee5d 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp ac6bf379c5906cf9612284911c121c9457f648a0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69369/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` and internal CI validation.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to