Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4804#issuecomment-76508900
OK, I apologize for belaboring this and hassle with the incorrect
suggestion earlier. But I think we may have to do one more thing for the
licensing to get it right, and we should. I believe we need an entry in our own
`LICENSE` file after all, given the situation. You can see one for the copied
TimSort. I'd just add it below that. Then it really does look good from a
license perspective, AFAIK.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
