Jonathancui123 commented on code in PR #36871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36871#discussion_r918142012


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/csv/CSVInferSchema.scala:
##########
@@ -117,7 +123,10 @@ class CSVInferSchema(val options: CSVOptions) extends 
Serializable {
         case LongType => tryParseLong(field)
         case _: DecimalType => tryParseDecimal(field)
         case DoubleType => tryParseDouble(field)
+        case DateType => tryParseDateTime(field)
+        case TimestampNTZType if options.inferDate => tryParseDateTime(field)

Review Comment:
   Our expected behavior is that in a column with `TimestampType` entries and 
then `DateType` entries, the column will be inferred as `TimestampType`. 
   
   Here, `tryParseTimestampNTZ` and `tryParseTimestamp` will not be able to 
parse the `DateType` entries that show up later in the column and the column 
will be promoted to string type. So we must use `tryParseDateTime` which will 
give a chance for the date to be parsed. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to