Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10570#discussion_r49139498
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ExpressionEvalHelper.scala
 ---
    @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ trait ExpressionEvalHelper extends 
GeneratorDrivenPropertyChecks {
         (result, expected) match {
           case (result: Array[Byte], expected: Array[Byte]) =>
             java.util.Arrays.equals(result, expected)
    -      case (result: Double, expected: Spread[Double]) =>
    -        expected.isWithin(result)
    +      case (result: Double, expected: Spread[_]) => // Can't use 
Spread[Double] b/c of erasure
    --- End diff --
    
    I see. Sadly, I think this is not going to work here without extra work, 
and then it is not going to do what you want. This version of scalatest uses 
manifest to encode type information, and you would have to define it manually 
in this context:
    ```scala
        implicit val x: Manifest[Int] = ???
        stream shouldBe a [ReceiverInputDStream[Int @unchecked]]
    ```
    but then the scalatest library is not aware of the `unchecked` annotation, 
and still throws a warning. Let's just have `_` in the suite file.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to