Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#discussion_r59053387
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/UnionRDD.scala ---
@@ -62,8 +62,14 @@ class UnionRDD[T: ClassTag](
var rdds: Seq[RDD[T]])
extends RDD[T](sc, Nil) { // Nil since we implement getDependencies
+ // visible for testing
+ private[spark] val isPartitionEvalParallel: Boolean =
+ rdds.length > conf.getInt("spark.rdd.parallelListingThreshold", 10)
+
override def getPartitions: Array[Partition] = {
- val array = new Array[Partition](rdds.map(_.partitions.length).sum)
+ val parRDDs = if (isPartitionEvalParallel) rdds.par else rdds
--- End diff --
No the problem is that this could be blocked entirely, if some random user
writes some code to block the global threadpool, or even a third party library
that does that. Spark should not use the global thread pool anywhere.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
