Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11242#discussion_r59111476
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/UnionRDD.scala ---
    @@ -62,8 +62,14 @@ class UnionRDD[T: ClassTag](
         var rdds: Seq[RDD[T]])
       extends RDD[T](sc, Nil) {  // Nil since we implement getDependencies
     
    +  // visible for testing
    +  private[spark] val isPartitionEvalParallel: Boolean =
    +    rdds.length > conf.getInt("spark.rdd.parallelListingThreshold", 10)
    +
       override def getPartitions: Array[Partition] = {
    -    val array = new Array[Partition](rdds.map(_.partitions.length).sum)
    +    val parRDDs = if (isPartitionEvalParallel) rdds.par else rdds
    --- End diff --
    
    just create a shared pool that can be used here.
    
    no user code wouldn't necessarily slow down the operation. just imagine 
somebody running the following:
    
    ```scala
    (1 to 1000).par.foreach(_ => Thread.sleep(100000000))
    ```
    
    suddenly nobody can use union anymore.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to