Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16659#discussion_r97203267
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/EquivalentExpressions.scala
 ---
    @@ -67,28 +67,33 @@ class EquivalentExpressions {
       /**
        * Adds the expression to this data structure recursively. Stops if a 
matching expression
        * is found. That is, if `expr` has already been added, its children are 
not added.
    -   * If ignoreLeaf is true, leaf nodes are ignored.
        */
    -  def addExprTree(
    -      root: Expression,
    -      ignoreLeaf: Boolean = true,
    -      skipReferenceToExpressions: Boolean = true): Unit = {
    -    val skip = (root.isInstanceOf[LeafExpression] && ignoreLeaf) ||
    +  def addExprTree(expr: Expression): Unit = {
    +    val skip = expr.isInstanceOf[LeafExpression] ||
           // `LambdaVariable` is usually used as a loop variable, which can't 
be evaluated ahead of the
           // loop. So we can't evaluate sub-expressions containing 
`LambdaVariable` at the beginning.
    -      root.find(_.isInstanceOf[LambdaVariable]).isDefined
    -    // There are some special expressions that we should not recurse into 
children.
    +      expr.find(_.isInstanceOf[LambdaVariable]).isDefined
    +
    +    // There are some special expressions that we should not recurse into 
all of its children.
         //   1. CodegenFallback: it's children will not be used to generate 
code (call eval() instead)
    -    //   2. ReferenceToExpressions: it's kind of an explicit 
sub-expression elimination.
    -    val shouldRecurse = root match {
    -      // TODO: some expressions implements `CodegenFallback` but can still 
do codegen,
    -      // e.g. `CaseWhen`, we should support them.
    -      case _: CodegenFallback => false
    -      case _: ReferenceToExpressions if skipReferenceToExpressions => false
    -      case _ => true
    +    //   2. If: common subexpressions will always be evaluated at the 
beginning, but the true and
    +    //          false expressions in `If` may not get accessed, according 
to the predicate
    +    //          expression. We should only recurse into the predicate 
expression.
    +    //   3. CaseWhen: like `If`, the children of `CaseWhen` only get 
accessed in a certain
    +    //                condition. We should only recurse into the first 
condition expression as it
    +    //                will always get accessed.
    +    //   4. Coalesce: it's also a conditional expression, we should only 
recurse into the first
    +    //                children, because others may not get accessed.
    +    def childrenToRecurse: Seq[Expression] = expr match {
    +      case _: CodegenFallback => Nil
    +      case i: If => i.predicate :: Nil
    +      case c: CaseWhenBase => c.children.head :: Nil
    --- End diff --
    
    This case is not reachable, could we leave a comment above this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to