Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17297#discussion_r106774285
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
    @@ -193,13 +193,6 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl 
private[scheduler](
           val stageTaskSets =
             taskSetsByStageIdAndAttempt.getOrElseUpdate(stage, new 
HashMap[Int, TaskSetManager])
           stageTaskSets(taskSet.stageAttemptId) = manager
    -      val conflictingTaskSet = stageTaskSets.exists { case (_, ts) =>
    --- End diff --
    
    actually, that is not really the point of this check.  Its just checking if 
one stage has two tasksets (aka stage attempts), where both are in the 
"non-zombie" state.  It doesn't do any checks at all on what tasks are actually 
in those tasksets.
    
    This is just checking an invariant which we believe to always be true, but 
we figure its better to fail-fast if we hit this condition, rather than proceed 
with some inconsistent state.  This check was added because behavior gets 
*really* confusing when the invariant is violated, and though we think it 
should always be true, we've still hit cases where it happens.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to