Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r124402141
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/IterativelyReweightedLeastSquaresSuite.scala
 ---
    @@ -169,29 +169,29 @@ class IterativelyReweightedLeastSquaresSuite extends 
SparkFunSuite with MLlibTes
     object IterativelyReweightedLeastSquaresSuite {
     
       def BinomialReweightFunc(
    -      instance: Instance,
    +      instance: OffsetInstance,
           model: WeightedLeastSquaresModel): (Double, Double) = {
    -    val eta = model.predict(instance.features)
    +    val eta = model.predict(instance.features) + instance.offset
         val mu = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-1.0 * eta))
    -    val z = eta + (instance.label - mu) / (mu * (1.0 - mu))
    +    val z = eta - instance.offset + (instance.label - mu) / (mu * (1.0 - 
mu))
    --- End diff --
    
    Indeed this is the correct implementation: in the IRWLS, we only include 
offset when computing `mu` and use `Xb` (without offset) when updating the 
working label. To see this clearly, one would have to derive the IRWLS. But for 
a quick reference, below is R's implementation:
    
    ```
    eta <- drop(x %*% start)
    mu <- linkinv(eta <- eta + offset)
    z <- (eta - offset)[good] + (y - mu)[good]/mu.eta.val[good]
    w <- sqrt((weights[good] * mu.eta.val[good]^2)/variance(mu)[good])
    fit <- .Call(C_Cdqrls, x[good, , drop = FALSE] * 
                  w, z * w, min(1e-07, control$epsilon/1000), check = FALSE)
    ```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to