Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18950#discussion_r134501323
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManagerSuite.scala ---
    @@ -188,10 +192,195 @@ class ExecutorAllocationManagerSuite
         assert(numExecutorsTarget(manager) === 10)
       }
     
    +  test("add executors capped by max concurrent tasks for a job group with 
single core executors") {
    +    val conf = new SparkConf()
    +      .setMaster("myDummyLocalExternalClusterManager")
    +      .setAppName("test-executor-allocation-manager")
    +      .set("spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled", "true")
    +      .set("spark.dynamicAllocation.testing", "true")
    +      .set("spark.job.group1.maxConcurrentTasks", "2")
    +      .set("spark.job.group2.maxConcurrentTasks", "5")
    +    val sc = new SparkContext(conf)
    +    contexts += sc
    +    sc.setJobGroup("group1", "", false)
    +
    +    val manager = sc.executorAllocationManager.get
    +    val stages = Seq(createStageInfo(0, 10), createStageInfo(1, 10))
    +    // Submit the job and stage start/submit events
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerJobStart(0, 0, stages, 
sc.getLocalProperties))
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerStageSubmitted(stages(0)))
    +
    +    // Verify that we're capped at number of max concurrent tasks in the 
stage
    +    assert(maxNumExecutorsNeeded(manager) === 2)
    +
    +    // Submit another stage in the same job
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerStageSubmitted(stages(1)))
    +    assert(maxNumExecutorsNeeded(manager) === 2)
    +
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerStageCompleted(stages(0)))
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerStageCompleted(stages(1)))
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerJobEnd(0, 10, JobSucceeded))
    +
    +    // Submit a new job in the same job group
    +    val stage2 = createStageInfo(2, 20)
    +    sc.listenerBus.postToAll(SparkListenerJobStart(1, 0, Seq{stage2}, 
sc.getLocalProperties))
    --- End diff --
    
    nit: still a few `Seq{}` you missed


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to