On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 3:59 AM Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14. May 2025, at 11:09, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > We needed an abstract that was higher level than the markdown tables. > > I often generate tables from CSV files. > E.g., > > https://github.com/cbor-wg/draft-ietf-cbor-cde > > (Files with “table” in the name.) > > In this case, this is a CSV, which could also be made available with the > RFC. > An HTML table is generally accessible for screen readers, which know how to tab between cells. Is the CSV for people who use the TXT file? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding? > In other cases, more happens in the generator program, and pointing to the > repo might be a better way to make more complex generation schemes > available. > If it's normative, I think it would not be a good idea for an RFC to point at a repo that might disappear (or change dramatically). > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
