On 10/15/25 3:02 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I would in fact like to hear some more details, as this is basically
standard practice in the industry.
Is it really, for things that are still in a somewhat incomplete state?
We're continually re-evaluating whether we can make a variant fully
public during the meeting, and if it turns out we can do so, we will.
We _certainly_ will long before this site becomes production.
The point of this demo is to get _interactive_ feedback and discussion
on what's already fairly complete. And, at the moment, there are places
where the incompleteness (or flat-out incorrectness) will be easier to
walk people through interactively.
RjS
-Ekr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:51 PM Alexis Rossi
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Eric,
This was discussed as a possibility at a recent call with the
engineering team, who decided against it. (I wasn't in that
meeting, so I'll let Robert weigh in if more details are needed.)
Thanks,
Alexis
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:07 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Alexis,
Would it be possible to put up some version of the site live
so that people can
try it themselves in some depth?
-Ekr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 11:55 AM Alexis Rossi
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello all,
Updates to RFC-Editor.org are underway, and you are
invited to preview the new version of the site at the RPC
desk at IETF 124 in Montreal (near registration).
You can read more about the it at:
https://www.ietf.org/blog/rfc-editor-website-update/
Thanks,
Alexis
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
