On 10/15/25 3:45 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:17 AM Robert Sparks <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 10/15/25 3:02 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I would in fact like to hear some more details, as this is
basically standard practice in the industry.
Is it really, for things that are still in a somewhat incomplete
state?
Yes, it's called a public beta. Put a password on it if you need
access control.
(Apologies for my lag on this) -
Thinking about this, my concern wasn't about incomplete software, it was
about global access to an erroneous alternate presentation of a curated
dataset (being the corpus of RFCs).
A specialized instance of the datatracker and some manual stubs are
providing the backend for the system until the new RPC backend is in
production. We've adjusted what the front-end shows in the places where
that stand-in data is exposed so that it's not misleading, and what's
shown is as correct as what the datatracker shows. Our current plan is
to make the demo available during the meeting to anyone with a
datatracker login.
If it's not ready for users to play with it, fine, put
some screenshots / videos in a blog post and send a link to this
list. Cmd-Shift-5.
"I have to show you this in person" is not standard.
--Richard
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
