Hmmm, that is the case at the moment, but I would rather not have it all then it only not running.
Regards > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rhelv5-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Long > Sent: 04 March 2008 13:36 > To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list > Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] Removal of redhat-lsb package > > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:10 +0000, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: > > Hi > > > > In order to remove cups from production servers I have to either use > > rpm -e --nodeps or I have to remove redhat-lsb meta package. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have a preference for either method or don't you remove > > cups. I don't believe a db or webserver has any need for cups. The LSB > > standard might be a bit to generic... > > You could just leave CUPS installed and chkconfig'd off. This way your > host maintains LSB compliancy but printing is disabled. > > /Brian/ > > -- > Brian Long | | > . | | | . | | | . > ' ' > C I S C O > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
