> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:09 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Are the filesystems incompatible?
> > they are not incompatible, verified by one of RedHat's ext engineers
>
> Maybe I asked the wrong question.  If the e2fsck program that comes
> with rhel3 is is not [fully] compatible with the rhel5 filesystem,
> that is a problem though, even though the filesystem itself can be
> mounted and used.   Again, hopefully a reboot won't be needed anytime
> soon!
>
> > While technically it should be fine, you can remove the ext_attr in
this
> > manner:
>
> I agree that your tests suggest that ext_attr isn't the problem.
> Maybe the problem is among these other 'filesystem features' that the
> rhel5-created filesystem has, that aren't among features listed for
> the rhel3-created filesystems:  resize_inode, dir_index, large_file;
> plus these default mount options (also as indicated by dumpe2fs):
> user_xattr, acl.  I'm not sure which of these prevents rhel3 from
> being able to fsck the device, and currently it's in use, so I can't
> experiment with changing anything.


maybe I misread.. For some reason I thought the error was when you tried to
mount, not when you tried to fsck the file system.

I just played with the fsck and to get rhel3 to fsck the rhel5 originating
filesystem I had to ermove the "resize_inode" feature.  I did this like
this:

debugfs -w /dev/path -R "features ^resize_inode"

then fsck ran fine, but not before.

-greg

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to