2010/1/21 Philipoff, Andrew <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > We run a number of RHEL 4.8 and RHEL 5.4 Samba fileservers that are > attached to a Windows Server 2003 Active Directory domain. > Everything was running fine until a Windows Server 2008 domain > controller was added into the domain.[snip] We’re running the latest > Red Hat Samba v 3.0.33-0.18.el4_8.1 and v3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 > packages. I’d really prefer to stick to the Red Hat rpm’s rather > than compile from source.
Hmmm, okay, I'm a bit confused. Did they just add a DC 2008? Or did they actually replace the DC 2003s? And where did they do the add/replace? Domain-level? Forest-level? Nothing should change as long as the Domain-level stays 2003 and, as a natural by-product, the Forest-level as well. Or did the DC 2008 replace a DC 2000 and the Domain/Forrest level actually changed from 2000 to 2003? -- Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat, Inc Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/consulting mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[email protected] (Blackberry/Red Hat-External) -------------------------------------------------------- You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other software and services firms for their own, direct needs, year after year? http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
