> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rhelv5-list- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan S Billings > Sent: 04 November 2010 12:38 > To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list > Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] df is inaccurate > > On 11/04/2010 07:57 AM, Nick Lunt wrote: > > So either df is wrong, I'm blind, or bc can't do take aways ;) > > > > Anyone know why df is wildly inaccurate ? > > It has to do with the reserved blocks: > > > % dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda3 | egrep 'Reserved block count|Block size' > dumpe2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) > Reserved block count: 935585 > Block size: 4096 > > % df -B4096 / > Filesystem 4K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda3 18125330 2651427 14538318 16% / > > % bc > bc 1.06 > Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > For details type `warranty'. > 18125330 - 2651427 > 15473903 > 15473903 - 14538318 > 935585
Aha that must be it then !! Thanks everyone for your help, I just thought df was crap ;) Cheers Nick. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5590 (20101104) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
