> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:rhelv5-list- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Sharpe > Sent: 04 November 2010 13:19 > To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list > Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] df is inaccurate > > On 4 November 2010 12:53, Nick Lunt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > # df -klP /var > > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available > Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol03 18095332 5268424 11896424 > 31% /var > > > > # bc > > bc 1.06 > > Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > > For details type `warranty'. > > 18095332 - 5268424 > > 12826908 > > > > 12826908 - 11896424 > > 930484 > > > > So df is 930484KB out. Right lets see if that's due to reserved blocks: > > > > # dumpe2fs /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol03 | grep -e "Reserved block > count" -e "Block size" > > dumpe2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) > > Reserved block count: 232621 > > Block size: 4096 > > > > 232621 blocks at 4KB each = 952815616KB, or 908GB!! > > > > Obviously I'm miscalculating here, what am I doing wrong ? > > Block size is in bytes, not kilobytes. If you do the right maths, you > see it equates to your result above: > > [13:17 s...@rackspace ~ ] > $ echo $((232621 * 4)) > 930484 > > -- > Sam
Sorted. Thanks everyone for your help. Nick . __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5590 (20101104) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
