[email protected] wrote on 03/02/2011 10:20:22 AM: > > On 3/2/11 10:51 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> 6: mypackage 1.0-1 is installed on the system and I run `yum update > >> mypackage-1.0-1` > > > > Response: Response that package-version is already installed. No action. > > Actual: Package is updated to 2.0-1 (latest package). > > Greg, I would consider subscribing the to yum upstream list[1] and > asking the yum "upstream"[2] developers as well. Of course, most or all > of the yum developers now work for Red Hat, but Seth Vidal has the long > history of yum and why it behaves like it does. At least you could get > a good answer with a possibly different perspective compared to RH support. > > Of course, if someone like Seth or James Anthill is already assigned to > your case, you'd probably get the same response. If RH support has not > pinged engineering yet (in this case, Seth or James I believe), you > should escalate. :) > > 1. http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum > 2. http://yum.baseurl.org/
thanks... the yum list was a step I was considering next. Was gonna wait to see how RH took the poll addition to the ticket first though (mostly cause I've got other priorities I should be focusing on atm). thanks _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
