On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Gerhardus Geldenhuis
<gerhardus.geldenh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I  am following an EMC Networker guide which is mentioning stopping
> irqbalance as a service and setting affnity for all network interfaces that
> that is faster than 1Gb.
>
> This is not something I have done before so learning rapidly.
>
> The logic behind it seems fine, and the Red Hat guide seems to suggest the
> same:
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Performance_Tuning_Guide/s-cpu-irq.html
>
> However this guide is for 6 and I am using 5.8 so I am reading it with a
> pinch of 5.8 salt.
>
> I have a number of questions:
> 1. The server in question is virtual. Logically it would seem that setting
> CPU affinity on virtualized infrastructure would have the same effect as on
> physical infrastructure. Valid assumption?
>
> 2. The server is provisioned with 4 cpu's each with 1 core. However cat
> /proc/irq/83/smp_affinity which is my interrupt for eth0 shows
> 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001
> (with irqbalance turned off )
> I am not yet completely clear on how the masking word and have yet to find a
> cleIar explanation. This value is double the amount of cores I actually
> have. This is a bit confusing so any explanation would be appreciated.
>
> 3. Lastly how do I set affinity, although understanding q2 would answer q3?
> I am happy to reread any documentation. The man 5 proc was not detailed
> enough and I found the above mentioned Red Hat guide also lacking in
> clarity.
>
> Disclaimer: Still suffering from the effects of a server bout of man flu so
> any lack of clarity might be entirely down to me....

I haven't actually done what you are talking about, however I'm
curious if there might be a simpler way.

The host machine for that virtual is which hypervisor? How many CPUs
(real vs HT etc)?

-greg

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to