In my opinion, even closing the KB by Red Hat, I mean you need to login to access the articles, was and is not good. If not open source, Linux and GNU, probably there would not be Red Hat today. Saying that they created Fedora to give something back to community would not be "politically" correct too, I think. Without community and open source there would not be Fedora too. I think they should try to make it even more open rather that closing it further. More knowledge you can get about the product, more likely you would go for it, I think. If there is a bug, someone will find it anyway sooner or later, so I think it is better to say "yes, we know and we work on it" and even "maybe you can even help us to fix it quicker" rather than pretend that "we did not know" when competition fixes that already.
Ges On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 16:56 -0500, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > I don't know how much they going to hide - there are many ways to get the > info if you are oracle - all you need is a 3rd party/proxy. > > BTW, its not only oracle, its also suse, centos, scientific linux and many > others. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of William Warren > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [rhelv6-list] Restricting bugzillas > > RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am seeing more and more > closed bugzilla entries even to registered accounts. Is this part of trying > to hide things from oracle? > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv6-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv6-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
