On 01/13/2012 09:22 PM, William Warren wrote: > That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default > for an open source product. Ever since the current CEO came in RH has > been getting more and ore secretive and this goes against the spirit of > Open Source.
is that really the case ? I see thousands of bz's against RHEL6 publicly visible. Some which were filed in the last day or so. What product do you see this against ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ rhelv6-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
