Thanks. what's more, I want to know if there is best practice for performance in this special situation, such as avoiding to do something, etc.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Sean Cribbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Note he said "secondary index", and yes installing the search hook on that > many buckets would clog up the ring state. > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Andrew Zeneski <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Sean, >> >> Doesn't enabling search on a bucket mean setting properties? At least the >> precommit hook property right? >> >> Andrew >> >> On Jul 10, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote: >> >> Wu, >> >> As long as you are not setting properties on those buckets, there are very >> few reasons why performance would be adversely affected. The bucket can >> simply be considered a prefix for the key. >> >> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Wu Ray <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, guys >>> >>> The common situation is there is hundreds buckets, every bucket has >>> millions of kv pairs. But my question is that I want millions of >>> buckets , every bucket has kv pairs from dozens to hundreds. >>> >>> So, in this condition, is Riak stiil a good solution, I means the >>> performance and second index search. >>> >>> Best regards. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
