Hi Zeeshan, Thanks for your answer.
> Just to be sure, does your custom schema include the required fields, as > mentioned in the docs: > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/advanced/search-schema/#Custom-Schemas? > Yes, I double checked that now to make sure, and the schema includes the required fields. > Are these Riak nodes joined? What’s your ring size, n_val value? > They run in a cluster, yes. Output of "riak-admin status": ring_creation_size : 64 ring_members : ['riak@IPADDRESS','riak@IPADDRESS'] ring_num_partitions : 64 ring_ownership : <<"[{'riak@IPADDRESS',32},{'riak@IPADDRESS',32}]">> rings_reconciled : 0 rings_reconciled_total : 33 n_val is 3, the initial one. According to the docs we should probably either add another node or reduce it to "2" though..correct? (Sorry, newbie in riak here :D) > How are you querying the Solr nodes to know which node has the data and > which one doesn't? Coverage is R=1, so you would be getting a different > number on some search queries (using the standard > /search/query/<index_name>?...) if its only on one of the Solr cores. > Yes exactly. That's how I figured out that there's a difference, later on I queried the separate Solr instances using the solr admin interface itself. I also then fetched the missing key on both the riak nodes (without going to solr, just fetching it directly using the riak HTTP API) and they exist on both nodes. > Can you also post me a screenshot of your search AAE exchanges, e.g. > `riak-admin search aae-status`? You could look at this thread, > http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2015-March/016926.html, > for answers on how to perform read-repair/repair the AAE tree. > aae-status is in the .log file attached. So you'd propose to perform a read-repair on the AAE tree? Best, Michael > > Thanks. > > Zeeshan Lakhani > programmer | > software engineer at @basho | > org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org > twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > > On Mar 25, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Michael Weibel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have on a test environment two riak nodes and each of them has solr > activated which index 3 buckets using a custom schema. > After testing a bit back and forth, I have the case that on one solr node, > an entry is not in the index (I know in which node though). > Fetching the specific key in the bucket works however, both nodes have the > respective entry. > > 1) How can this happen? I don't see any error/warning in the logs (neither > solr nor riak logs). > 2) Is there a possibility to fix this without having to do e.g. a PUT on > the specific key with the same content in order to update it? > > I tried to run a repair on the failing node using the guide: > http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.4.7/ops/running/recovery/repairing-indexes/#Repairing-Search-Indexes > When running the repair command on the partitions I received, it gave me > however a [{<PartitionId>, down}, {...}] response, which gives me an > uncomfortable feeling, but I didn't really figure out yet what this means > exactly. > > Thanks a lot for your help :) > > Best, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
riak-admin-aae-status.log
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
