Thanks Dmitri, appreciate the effort. You might have a point there. I think it indeed does have to do with our Nginx configuration. Stanchion is communicating with nginx as a proxy to our riak nodes. I just tested out pointing stanchion directly to one of our Riak nodes and the admin user creation went through. You're a hero. Need to debug the Nginx proxy.
Ben On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidu...@basho.com> wrote: > Ben, > > Not sure what to advise. Your configs look ok. > I just downloaded a fresh copy of Riak CS 2.0.1, Stanchion, and a fresh > Riak 2. > I set up the configs just as you have (changing only the paths in > advanced.config to match my machine). > Cutting and pasting your curl line seems to result in correct user > creation. > So, the dreaded "Works For Me (tm)". > > The only thing I can think of is - double and triple-check all involved > firewalls. > Searching about for that error message let me to this thread: > > http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/adding-auth-user-not-valid-td4033452.html > > Which indicates that the error message can be caused by CS not being able > to access Stanchion. You mentioned that you can telnet into stanchion_host > from the riak node. Is Stanchion set to listen to the correct IP and port? > > Dmitri > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ben Rudolph <brudo...@dimagi.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the response Dmitri. Just double checked all those settings >> >> 1) I checked with stanchion ping and i'm also able to telnet into the >> stanchion_host from the riak node >> 2)Double checked and it shows up in the logs: >> <0.142.0>@riak_cs_config:warnings:120 `anonymous_user_creation` is set as >> true. Set this as false when this CS nodes is populated as public service. >> 3) Yes >> 4) Yes >> >> In case useful, here are our configs: >> https://github.com/dimagi/commcarehq-ansible/tree/riak/ansible/roles/riakcs/templates >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidu...@basho.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ben, >>> >>> Just to double-check: >>> 1) is Stanchion installed and running, when you try to create the user? >>> (and the stanchion_host entry is pointing to it, in cs config?) >>> >>> 2) is anonymous_user_creation = on in the config file? >>> >>> 3) do you have 'buckets.default.allow_mult = true' in the Riak config >>> file? >>> >>> 4) (this is likely to be yes, but just to check) Have you restarted Riak >>> since configuring the advanced.config backend? >>> >>> Dmitri >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ben Rudolph <brudo...@dimagi.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've almost completed the cluster setup but am running into issues with >>>> anonymous user creation. All machines ping/pong and their IPs are matching. >>>> When I run the curl command to create an anonymous user: >>>> >>>> curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -XPOST http://**:8080/riak-cs/user >>>> --data '{"email":"em...@email.com", "name":"admin_user"}' >>>> >>>> And I get an XML response that says Internal Server Error. The >>>> console.log file looks like this: >>>> >>>> 2015-11-24 23:16:35.572 [error] <0.439.0> Webmachine error at path >>>> "/riak-cs/user" : >>>> {error,{error,{badmatch,{error,malformed_xml}},[{riak_cs_s3_response,xml_error_code,1,[{file,"src/riak_cs_s3_response.erl"},{line,335}]},{riak_cs_s3_response,error_response,1,[{file,"src/riak_cs_s3_response.erl"},{line,249}]},{riak_cs_wm_user,accept_json,2,[{file,"src/riak_cs_wm_user.erl"},{line,119}]},{webmachine_resource,resource_call,3,[{file,"src/webmachine_resource.erl"},{line,186}]},{webmachine_resource,do,3,[{file,"src/webmachine_resource.erl"},{line,142}]},{webmachine_decision_core,resource_call,...},...]}} >>>> in riak_cs_s3_response:xml_error_code/1 line 335 >>>> >>>> Which led me to this issue here >>>> <https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/970>. However my >>>> advanced.config already looks like this (which is what is suggested in the >>>> issue): >>>> [ >>>> {riak_kv, [ >>>> {add_paths, ["/usr/lib/riak-cs/lib/riak_cs-2.0.1/ebin"]}, >>>> {storage_backend, riak_cs_kv_multi_backend}, >>>> {multi_backend_prefix_list, [{<<"0b:">>, be_blocks}]}, >>>> {multi_backend_default, be_default}, >>>> {multi_backend, [ >>>> {be_default, riak_kv_eleveldb_backend, [ >>>> {total_leveldb_mem_percent, 30}, >>>> {data_root, "/opt/data/riak/leveldb"} >>>> ]}, >>>> {be_blocks, riak_kv_bitcask_backend, [ >>>> {data_root, "/opt/data/riak/bitcask"} >>>> ]} >>>> ]} >>>> ]} >>>> ]. >>>> >>>> Any insight would be useful! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> riak-users mailing list >>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
