Armel wrote: >>And yes, the measurements have been done. >I would not call Science giving the MgB2 atomic >coordinates, already known. Was this meant to be serious? Checking for any subtle structural changes around Tc would be (has been?) a worthwhile investigation. Something easily worthy of the word "science", as I understand it. Knowing what the structure does or doesn't do around the transition would be a prerequisite to a deeper understanding of the phenomena. Apologies if it's just that my sense of irony has been in remission this morning. Jon
- Most cited powder diffraction papers Armel Le Bail
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Radaelli, PG (Paolo)
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Armel Le Bail
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Alan Hewat
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction pap... Armel Le Bail
- Neutron diffraction with boron Brian H. Toby
- RE: Neutron diffraction with boron ak... E. K. Akdogan
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boro... N. Dragoe
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boron Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boro... Jonathan WRIGHT
- Re: Neutron diffraction with... Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffraction ... Alan Hewat
- Re: Neutron diffract... Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffract... Jonathan WRIGHT
- Re: Neutron diffract... Armel Le Bail
- RE: Neutron diffraction ... E. K. Akdogan
- RE: Neutron diffract... Peter Y. Zavalij
- RE: Neutron diffract... E. K. Akdogan
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Radaelli, PG (Paolo)
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Pierre Ferdinand Poudeu