> Yes it is mainly down to the Soller slits,
> there was a very large thread on
> soller slits somewhere in the Rietveld archives
> about this discussion. I think the down side of
> changing the soller slits is a move away from the
> optimum FWHM that can be obtained?
Changing sollers from 0.04 rad to 0.02 or 0.01 reduces the asymmetry,
the FWHM and the intensity, so the peak shape and the resolution become
more optimal but the intensity is sacrificed.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
