I just read through the rest of the discussion. He only thing to add is that I think the flat sample does play a role in the para part of the focusing.
A real focusing experiment includes the light source entrance slit, “curved diffraction grating” (what we call our sample), and exit slits all on the perimeter of a Rowland circle (the center is the center of the goniometer, technically). Since it clearly would be a significantly difficult exercise to a) create a sample that has the right radius of curvature (and it would have to be infinitesimally thin to boot), and b) continuously change the diffraction grating to exit slit distance, the BB geometry uses a) a flat diffraction grating and b) a fixed grating to exit slits distance, which almost looks like an experiment with a flat diffraction grating and a Rowland circle of changing diameter. Therefore, parafocusing geometry as in “almost focusing geometry” describes the arrangement of a BB optical bench quite nicely. Alex Y _______________________________ Dr. Alexandre (Alex) F. T. Yokochi Professor of Chemical Engineering Laboratory for innovative Reaction Engineering for Materials and Sustainability (iREMS lab) School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 - 2702 From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of ian.mad...@csiro.au Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 1:06 AM To: rietveld_l@ill.fr; rowle...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Parafocussing definition? Hi Matthew, I've got some nice figures from an old XRD Basics presentation from decades ago - the problem is that all this stuff is in my CSIRO office and I'm at home! However, I will do my best to recall the basic principles of parafocusing In a Bragg-Brentano instrument:- 1. The source (tube target) and receiving slit are both on the diffractometer circle (not to be confused with the focusing circle) and are equidistant from the diffractometer (rotation) axis. 2. The beam is divergent (strictly speaking, a parallel beam instrument is not Bragg-Brentano geometry). 3. The sample is an extended flat plate. 4. The centre line of the incident beam will strike the sample at the centre of the diffractometer rotation axis (assuming the instrument is well aligned and the sample properly presented - not always a given!) at some angle theta. This beam will diffract from crystal planes parallel to the surface to the receiving slit also at an angle theta (yippee - theta + theta = 2theta - I'm a maths wiz) 5. The lower extremity of the diverging incident beam will strike the sample on the tube side of the diffractometer rotation axis at some angle (theta + phi). Now (and this is where the magic comes in) this beam will diffract from planes rotated phi degrees to the surface - for the same reflection as in 4. above, this means that the diffracted beam now makes an angle of (theta - phi) to the surface. Now (theta + phi) + (theta - phi) = 2theta - still amazing. 6. The upper extremity of the diverging incident beam will strike the sample on the detector side of the diffractometer rotation axis ... follow reasoning above for planes rotated -phi with respect to the sample surface. 7. This works because (this is the important bit) within a circle equal arcs make equal angles - a simple ray tracing diagram will help here. 8. Part of the reason Bragg-Brentano instruments have good intensity is due to the fact that the diverging beam will diffract from a wider range of crystallite orientations than say a parallel beam instrument. 9. There is no true 'focusing' of the X-ray beam in this context - the apparent focusing is happening because of 4 - 6 above in the context of diverging beams. 10. I don't think that flat vs curved sample needs to come into this explanation. I hope this helps. Cheers o----------------------------oo0oo----------------------------o Ian Madsen Honorary Fellow CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship Private Bag 10, Clayton South 3169 Victoria, AUSTRALIA Phone +61 3 9545 8785 direct +61 3 9545 8500 switch +61 (0) 417 554 935 mobile FAX +61 3 9562 8919 Email ian.mad...@csiro.au<mailto:ian.mad...@csiro.au> o----------------------------oo0oo----------------------------o ________________________________ From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr<mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr> <rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr<mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr>> on behalf of Matthew Rowles <rowle...@gmail.com<mailto:rowle...@gmail.com>> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 3:52 PM To: RIETVELD_L Distribution List Subject: Parafocussing definition? Hi all I've been trying to find a good explanation of what parafocussing (wrt Bragg-Brentato geometry) actually is, but haven't been able to find one. Klug and Alexander just reference Brentano's papers. "The Basics of Crystallography and Diffraction" 2nd ed say that B-B geometry is "semi-focussing" because the sample is flat, and not curved to follow the focussing circle (this doesn't sound right to me) Brentano, J Appl. Phys. 17, 420 (1946) says that a ray reflecting off the arc defined by ACB where A is the source, C is the centre of the gonio, and B is the detector (ie the focussing circle) is automatically parafocussing, because you only can establish the location of the crystallites, not their orientation, but then goes on to say that you can actually find the orientation, as the lattice plane normal bisects the angle ACB. I also haven't been able to find a use of the word "parafocus" outside of the diffraction literature, so I can't see how the word is used elsewhere. Any ideas? Matthew
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
