Armel, it's not about you :-) But in your 1988 paper you did not reference Pawley (1980) and even Rietveld only appeared as #14 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228084768_Ab_Initio_Structure_Determination_of_LiSbWO6_by_X_ray_Powder_Diffraction#fullTextFileContent
But let's not change the subject. You have published comments, linked to in your opening post, accusing respected scientists of "*Calumny... towards a dead man who cannot defend himself*". Simply because people who have direct experience of the history (which is often about dead men) do not agree with you. And yes, Columbus did not discover America either, but he contributed. Be content with contributing, and let it go. Regards Alan ________________________________ Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone) alan.he...@neutronoptics.com +33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856 http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat _______________________________ On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, 17:49 Le Bail Armel, <le-bail.ar...@orange.fr> wrote: > >And there are other examples. See this brief review of "Whole Pattern > Fitting - The Pawley Method" (1980) yet few people now attribute this kind > of profile refinement to Pawley. > http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/solve1/pawley.htm > > Few people ? At least me : > > https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/itc/Ha/ch3o5v0001/sec3o5o2o2o1/? > > And 2168 papers cite the 1980 Pawley paper according to Google Scholar as > of today. > > Be more clear. What are exactly those other examples ? > > ALB >
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
