Hi Frederic,
There's not really a need to leave this space between submissions
because the order of submissions doesn't matter at all. Nothing in
RIFE is related to the fact that one submission comes before the
other or vice versa.
Best regards,
Geert
On 04 Jul 2006, at 12:55, Frederic Daoud wrote:
So, it still feels to me that the positioning scheme I proposed is
the best solution.
What do you think?
Honestly, it's hard to predict any issues there could be in practice.
The solution has to be on the road for a while first. But, like you
said,
there is no duplication of information, Should be pretty simple to
number
your submission N and its parameters N.1, N.2, etc.
My biggest issue was renumbering, but with your proposed scheme it
shouldn't
be a problem. Like you said, if you have a submission N and parameters
N.1 thru N.10, and you need to insert an extra parameter between 5
and 6,
you could just number it N.5.1 and leave the others untouched.
So yes, probably that's the best solution..
Would you still have to leave "space" between submissions? For
example,
you if you have submissions 1 and 2, with parameters 1.1, 1.2, etc.
and
2.1, 2.2, etc., and you need to insert a new submission and its
parameters
between 1 and 2?
Frederic
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
Rife-users@uwyn.com
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
--
Geert Bevin
Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
Music and words - http://gbevin.com
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
Rife-users@uwyn.com
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
