Hi Robert,
weirdly, some of the SW probes are showing as "online" but do not provide any 
measurements results [event the Built-in ones], such as your mentioned 1000030 
[Latest data point shown is from 2019-12-17 11:57 UTC]
Also for example measurement https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/23955368/ 
shows 18 out of 71 SW probes were online [at the moment when I created the 
measurement] but never provided any results.
In https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/23962519/ I requested all probes with 
tag system-software, you can see how many probes are Online while not providing 
any results.

What I wanted to point out - I run SW probe 1000069 in Turris Omnia router and 
I noticed the same behavior - after router restart the SW probe goes online and 
looks fine, but does not send any results, until I restart the ATLAS process 
manually, then it runs fine until next router's reboot / power cycle.

Cheers
Jiri



______________________________________________________________
> Od: "Robert Kisteleki" <rob...@ripe.net>
> Komu: "Romain Fontugne" <rom...@iij.ad.jp>
> Datum: 14.02.2020 10:38
> Předmět: Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
>
> CC: <ripe-atlas@ripe.net>
>
>To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded
>devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs
>Linux on nowadays.
>
>Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but
>if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS,
>same prefix, approximately same location):
>
>https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000030/ (sw)
>https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/  (v3)
>
>or:
>
>https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000041/ (sw)
>https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4)
>
>Cheers,
>Robert
>
>
>On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote:
>> my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old v1
>> seems a msec slower. All are very stable
>> 
>> Romain
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 1000004, and
>>> 1000006 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same vrrp
>>> exit etc.
>>>
>>> randy
>>>
>> 
>
>
>

Reply via email to