On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:46 -0700, Regnad wrote: > please explain why I should not use Windows Media Player to rip to > unprotected WMA lossless format. What is the downside to this as it
Why would you prefer a closed proprietary format, WMA over FLAC that is open source, free, and has the same technical result (lossless compression)? I can not see _any_ reason to prefer WMA over FLAC for songs that I rip. I could imagine a reason to buy singles in WMA format, but I'd rather buy them in Flac or ogg or even MP3. -- Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
