tlp;155378 Wrote: 
> Yeah, what a pain to get around someone's right to protect their
> intellectual property.  And it's so hard to find free programs and PHP
> (or other) scripts to automate it for you.  Whew, that IS a drag.

Huh?  It's not a pain at all: I won't buy music that I can't listen to.
I can't listent to music from ITMS, and I can't listen to music from
PlaysForSure sellers, and I can't listen to music from the Zune store.

So I don't buy it.

If recording companies (artists are rarely part of this decision)
choose to make their music inaccessable, then I won't buy it in those
formats.

You seem to believe I am advocating piracy because I refuse to pay for
music I cant listen to.  No, I am saying why the hell would I buy music
I can't listen to?  I spend good money at emusic, dgmlive and Amazon on
music.  Last I checked, it was still legal to own cd's.

> 
> But what's really a hoot, and what I'd like to know, from an old (40+!)
> retired internet CTO and long-time audio engineering hobbiest (speakers
> and amps), is how you calculate signal loss from this process.  The
> burn/rip should be digitally identical.  The re-encoding is entirely up
> to you and there is no reason for bandwidith or amplitude degradation
> from the original digital to most formats you can re-encode to.  So
> please, help me out, I would seriously like to know how you calculate
> signal loss from this process.

Quality loss.

When you download a song from ITMS or Walmart or whoever you get a
128k'ish lossy compressed file.  It has lost data from the original
recording.

Now you burn that to a CD: that step is lossless, sure.  So is ripping
it from a CD.  But you have already lost data.

If you then re-encode it so that you can get 6-10 hours of music on a
CD, you lose data.   Your only choice to preserve what data was there
on the downloaded file is to have a CD that has no more than 70 minutes
of music on it.

But if I buy a CD, rip it and encode it myself, I only have one
transition that loses data, instead of two.  I also have a higher
quality version on the player, since I can encode at better than
128kbps.

Surely you don't believe that lossy compression can be repeated without
loss.

"The re-encoding is up to you"... no, it isn't.  It is one of the
conditions I put on music that I buy.  I must be able to listen to it
on my nice old pjbox, my car stereo (on my usual 6-10 hour cd's: I
dislike swapping cds while driving) and my Squeezeboxes.


-- 
snarlydwarf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29626

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to