Pat Farrell;236724 Wrote: > IvanSlade wrote: > > You don't measure better as it is not 'quantifable'. Which metric > are > > you referring to? That on the 12 fold manifold in string theory or > that > > in the 4D time / space metric? > > In general, to say that thing X is better than thing Y, you are saying > that on metric M, M(X) > M(Y) > > The metric could be beauty, and you might say that > B(Ang. Joile) > B(Queen Elizabeth) > and while Her Majesty is a pretty nice girl she isn't now, and never > was > movie star beautiful > > The RedBook specs have a lot of stuff to allow "adequate" sound to > come > without perfect playback of all the bits. > > When you are not with the bits you love, love the one you are with. > > If the purpose of a sports car is to get you arround the race track, > then faster lap times == better. But if you define that a better > sports > car gets you prettier women, than maybe a Jaguar XKE is better. One of > the geeks at Car and Driver or Road and Track picked up Julie Christie > at a party in an XKE. > > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/
Just seen Pat 'a metric can be beauty' as you write. A metric has nothing to do with metaphysical or psychoacoustic problems. -- IvanSlade ------------------------------------------------------------------------ IvanSlade's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12094 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39485 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
