tamanaco wrote:
> funkstar;237667 Wrote:
>> But it will in the future, thats the kicker.
>>
>> At some point in the distant future, when Josh decides there are next
>> to no 1.1.x decoders in use, he *might* introduce new features that
>> will only work with 1.2.x and higher.
>>
>> This is from the FLAC 1.2.0 release thread on Hydrogen Audio.
>>
>> So, right now you are correct. In the future that might change :)
>
> Hmmm, interesting, but I hope this won't be the case. I have encoded
> about 120 of my CDs with 1.1.3, about 250 with 1.1.4 and the rest...,
> about 230+ (which I have not finished ripping yet) and any new CD I
> buy, will be encoded with 1.2.0 or higher. Once I rip my CDs I put
> them in boxes and store then in Manhattan mini-storage. I don't have
> the room to store them in my apartment. The main reason I went with
> FLAC was because it was an open "lossless" format. I hope the changes
> ("new" features) that he's talking about are related to changes in the
> "TAGS" that can be added/modified using existing or future tag tools. I
> only want to rip these CDs once... I don't mind editing or adding tags,
> but making my library and every other existing 1.x.x library obsolete
> or less desirable is not something that I'd advertise. Any new version
> of the decoders must remain backwards compatible with a
> not-too-cumbersome upgrade path.
It's trivial to re-encode your files with flac 1.2.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38160
R.
_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
