>I am happy with the new names because I can use the same mapping names >for mp3's and flac-files (this means less user-defined field >mappings). I don't need any mappings with the version before this change...
>In my opinion it would be a good thing if SBS also would use these >mapping names..... > Not sure what you mean - SBS reads tags and stores them in it's own music library structure, rather than using tag mapping names. SBS is already configurable to decide how you want tags to be mapped to it's music library content. >I also have customized columns, scripts etc. >And, yes they need to be adjust. But that is not a big job for existing >advanced users. For new users these new mapping names will be more >logical. > Unless they want to use Band/Orchestra. eg. users who have classical music to tag. >You can re-configure mp3tag with the "User-defined field mappings" That doesn't completely address the issue. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
