Hi Nathan,

We use RDCATCH on dedicated logging archiving machines here, and have run into 
a few rather upsetting problems.

We have seen our recordings end 2-8 seconds early consistently, and also of 
late have had a even more perplexing problem.  Say we have four recording 
ending (4 hour recordings each) at 11:00AM.  There are also 2 more recordings 
starting at 11:00AM.  At the appointed time, the recording ends but RDCATCH has 
to write all of the ending data via NFS, and start the new recordings at the 
same time.  This used to work perfectly but suddenly stopped working.  We would 
have a drop out of 5 - 12 seconds THROUGHOUT the network  (many studios running 
here - but usually atleast 5 studios broadcasting/recording).

We looked at network traffic, switches, etc. and have not seemed to find the 
culprit (Note: the Rivendell system did not change in any way, but is also an 
older version - 1.5.2).

Solution for now was staggering the recording so everything was not happening 
at once.  However this has been an ongoing issue for us even withstanding the 
newest glitch.

So, we may be looking at finding another way to capture our recordings other 
than the ways we do it now....Obviously a network wide dropout is not something 
we want...

Hope this give you food for thought.  If anybody else has seen this type of 
behavior please feel free to chime in.

Best Of Luck,

Todd Baker
Radio Free Asia , Washington DC


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Steele" <nathan.ste...@thecrossfm.com>
To: "User discussion about the Rivendell Radio Automation System" 
<rivendell-...@caspian.paravelsystems.com>
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 10:18:42 AM
Subject: Re: [RDD] OT: Rotter question

As always, the obvious eludes me....

Does anyone use rdcatch in this way or has anyone tried it and why did 
you switch.....

Nathaniel C. Steele
Assistant Chief Engineer/Technical Director
WTRM-FM / TheCrossFM

On 11/9/2012 8:20 AM, Alan Peterson wrote:
> No one's mentioned it yet, so I may as well break the silence...
>
> Would there be anything wrong or improper in using RD Catch on a dedicated 
> logging/archiving machine instead? It's already been built for you (on the 
> appliance disk), works right out'a the box, and is designed to handle 
> multiple inputs.
>
> Just sayin'....
>
> -AP
> _______________________________________________
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to