Hi guys I know: being a Websh maintainer, I'm kind of on the wrong list, but hey ... ;-)
> The other hand, Websh has very strong framework, such as session managemant. > I think it is an advantage. > And websh supports Apache2. it may be another advantage. > But websh's syntax, I think, it is never understandable;-) Well, there certainly is stuff that's not incredibly obvious, but "never understandable" is probably a slight exaggeration... > if you are using simple <? ... ?> scripts, I think you must rewrite > many scripts. You can change Websh to also use the <? ?> notation, but the syntax of its commands are still different, so you don't relly win much I guess. > Some days ago, I rewrote my rivet script to websh. :-) > Additionaly, Rivet and websh are supports tcl unicode framework. > but websh has a bug. So if you want to make l10n/m17n site, > you will get fatal probrems. > And websh has other bug. it open tmp file using mode '644'. So all > local users will be able to read it. > I've made patches for fix them, and posted it to websh-devel ML. > But I've never got any resp;-( Please sent your bug reports to [email protected] (with me in CC). I don't remember any mails regarding these issue, except for a supposedly unsolved "special characters" issue that I could not reproduce. Regards Ronnie ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ronnie Brunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netcetera AG, 8040 Zuerich, phone +41 44 247 79 79 fax +41 44 247 70 75 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
