On Thursday 12 July 2007 17:59:15 Tiberiu Socaciu wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dizzy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Poate aberez dar din cate imi aduc aminte problema mare cu qmail-scanner > > e ca > > e un script perl. Si iti dai seama ce inseamna sa porneasca cate un > > script perl pt FIECARE mail trimis. Este un cost imens de CPU cel putin. > > Eu foloseam > > qscan (http://www.usinglinux.org/mail/qscan.html) care era un program C > > scris > > in stilul DJB si era mult mai rapid decat qmail-scanner ca sa interfatez > > cu > > diverse chestii externe pt virus/spam. > > ce e ala djb-style? :D
Adica sa iei valori random bazandu-te pe PID-ul procesului curent... etc Sau cum bine a zis-o chiar Linus Torvalds (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/6/9): <--- cut here ---> qmail is a piece of crap. The source code is completely unreadable, and it seems to think that "getpid()" is a good source of random data. Don't ask me why. It literally does things like random = now() + (getpid() << 16); and since there isn't a single comment in the whole source tree, it's pointless to wonder why. (In case you wonder, "now()" just does a "time(NULL)" call - whee.). I don't understand why people bother with it. It's not like Dan Bernstein is so charming that it makes up for the deficiencies of his programs. </--- cut here ---> Mihai _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list RLUG@lists.lug.ro http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
