Nu e de la isize. Are valoarea default (isize=256). M-am uitat cu xfs_info de
la inceput. Am si mentionat ca outputul de la xfs_info este similar pentru
ambele servere, DAR numarul maxim de inoduri difera foarte mult.
Pe nodul cu problema (numar max de inoduri raportat de df: 70k): in scadere
fata de acum o ora cu vreo 10k :)) dar ordinul de marime ramane.
# df -i|grep root
/dev/mapper/centos-root 69120 66223 2897 96% /
# xfs_info /
meta-data=/dev/mapper/centos-root isize=256 agcount=17, agsize=819136 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0 finobt=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=13107200, imaxpct=25
= sunit=64 swidth=64 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=6400, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=64 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Pe nodul sanatos (numar max de inoduri raportat de df: 52milioane):
# df -i|grep root
/dev/mapper/centos-root 52424704 66137 52358567 1% /
# xfs_info /
meta-data=/dev/mapper/centos-root isize=256 agcount=16, agsize=819136 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0 finobt=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=13106176, imaxpct=25
= sunit=64 swidth=64 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=6400, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=64 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Eu nu vad nicio diferenta care sa ma duca cu gandul la diferenta aceasta imensa
de la 52milioane de inoduri vs 80mii inoduri.
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 7/26/16, Cristian Paslaru <cryst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [rlug] partition 100% full No space left on device
To: "lista email" <lista.em...@yahoo.com>, "Romanian Linux Users Group"
<rlug@lists.lug.ro>
Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2016, 3:38 PM
Ce isize
ai la /?Default e 256, si daca ai asa putine inodes
avail, este posibil sa ai un isize huge, hence your
issue.
Incearca
xfs_info /
Sporuri.
2016-07-26 14:26 GMT+03:00
lista email <lista.em...@yahoo.com>:
am scris in primul email, un raport
complet.
Da, inoduri mai sunt, dar tocmai aici este diferenta!
Pe nodul seek:
# df -i|grep root
/dev/mapper/centos-root 77104 66220 10884
86% /
pe nodul ok:
# df -i|grep root
/dev/mapper/centos-root
52424704 66137 52358567 1% /
Ambele au partitias / de 50GB!
Dupa cate se poate observa, pe nodul ok sunt peste 52
milioane de inoduri in timp ce pe cel cu fs-ul full sunt in
jur de 77K. Cum se explica aceasta diferenta de indouri
pentru doua partitii cu aceeasi dimensiune? Din acest motiv,
Wofly cat si Bogdan au avansat idea uni xfs corupt catre
care incep si eu sa inclin ...
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 7/26/16, Matei,
Petre-Marius <mat.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [rlug] partition 100% full No space left on
device
To: rlug@lists.lug.ro
Date:
Tuesday, July 26, 2016, 1:06 PM
On 26.07.2016 12:07,
Bogdan-Stefan Rotariu wrote:
> On 26 July
2016 at 12:04:08, lista email (lista.em...@yahoo.com)
wrote:
>
> Buna
tuturor,
>
> Neata,
>
> Ma uit de cateva zile
peste un centos 7 si nu reusesc sa-mi dau seama de ce df
imi
raporteaza ca partitia / este ~100% full iar du imi
raporteaza usage de numai 1.7G din 50GB (adica sub 4%).
Mentionez ca partitia / este formatata xfs.
>
>
>
> Probabil ai o
aplicatie care tine un fisier deschis, desi el nu mai
exista
vizibil in fs.
>
>
lsof -nP | grep '(deleted)’
>
> sau cu listing mai ‘fancy’:
>
> find /proc/*/fd -ls |
grep '(deleted)'
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> RLUG mailing list
> RLUG@lists.lug.ro
> http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
dar inoduri mai sunt?
df -i
Marius
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@lists.lug.ro
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@lists.lug.ro
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@lists.lug.ro
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
