B. Mitchell wrote:

William Roddy wrote:

Has anyone tried PC-BSD? Does anyone know if that's a good place to start, for those of us who don't know FreeBSD?


I just gave it a shot, today. First of all, I am not a big fan of KDE (or Gnome for that matter), but it should provide a usable environment for those that use a GUI day-to-day.

Second, the native packaging system does not support checksums on the downloaded binaries. Ack. I would suggest sticking to the ports tree (which you should be doing anyway, imho) for installing software.

I am glad to see it doesn't install BASH by default. I say this not because I have anything _against_ BASH, but because other BSDs don't use BASH by default. It good to know that they have not changed that first shell experience on BSD.

Finally, PC-BSD seemed to detect and make use of most of my hardware on the test box. Nothing exciting in there, so not much of a surprise.

The OS seems reasonably capable, albeit underdeveloped. Despite having the hesitation to use a 'real' BSD, William, I would suggest just diving in to Free or NetBSD (OpenBSD has never really been the most 'user friendly' BSD - some quirks _will_ scare you). If anything hurts, just think, "it builds character!" =D

Thanks for the extremely informative reply.

As a brief explanation, I'm disabled and a senior citizen, and I'm in and out of the VA hospital quite a lot, so diving into something complex, however tempting, is not something I can comfortably do. However, I wish I could experience BSD because I hear so much about it. Since I don't have spare machines, and I used Linux as my primary operating system (started using it prior to my intense illnesses, so I've had little start) and use it for more than just a toy box, I can't risk disabling my machines.

I'm seriously considering becoming a Buddhist, so I can work toward reincarnating as an IT.

You've given me a lot to think about. Thank you for the time you spent replying.

William

_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug

Reply via email to