On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:31:57 +0200 (CEST), Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Björn Stenberg wrote: > >I think we have the law on our side. The images are not copied from their game >and they aren't identical, as anyone can see. The only claim they could make >would be that our images are "too similar" to theirs and thus could be >considered plagiarism. The only way to really find out if we are "too similar" >is to battle in court. > >However, I don't think we'd loose anything by being "soft" and simply modify >our jewels somewhat so that they don't look so similar to their versions, just >to be nice. I think that we lose a lot by changing something that isn't infringing in the first place. Demonstrating that we'll just roll over and go away anytime anyone gripes is the sure way to have to be constantly responding to every Tom, Dick and Harry that comes along. Just say NO. John --- John De Armond See my website for my current email address http://www.johngsbbq.com Cleveland, Occupied TN Don't let your schooling interfere with your education-Mark Twain
