On 20.09.2007, Austin Appel wrote: > It seems that we have had a big surge in "annoyances" in > #rockbox lately. To put it short, do people think the time has > come where we need to move to the split model? #rockbox (for > support), #rockbox-dev (for development), #rockbox-community
I never experienced that "talk over" as an annoyance, and I'd rather like to keep the single channel model. It makes it easier for a dev interact with users, e.g. calls for testers or working on a fix remotely. If the channels would be split, I would probably join only #rockbox-dev normally, because I don't normally *need* the user talk, even though it doesn't annoy me. And while user feedback would be worse that way, I would still be annoyed by other things in the dev channel which exist right now and are *not* user related (e.g. talk about 3rd and 4th steps before even doing the 1st). Just my 0.02, Jens