On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Thomas Martitiz<s0523...@htw-berlin.de> wrote: > He explained it already three times.
And why seems it so hard for you to accept that one explanation that might be sufficient to *you* not necessarily is sufficient for *somebody else*? Does this someone, given such a case, have no right to ask again for further explanation? Is he a moron, flaming or an idiot simply because he's not understanding the response, seeing further issue that haven't been mentioned before (thus going one step further with his thinking about the original problem, which usually is a good thing, at least IMO!) or needing further clarification for other reasons? - Dominik
