Rob Purchase a écrit : > My suggestion would be: > > Gold - "top tier" ports, as per Dave's email (eg. iArchos, iHP, X5, F/X > etc) > Silver - mature ports, but with some flaws (eg. iPods, maybe Sansa AMS, > etc) > Bronze - working ports, but with significant flaws (eg. Gigabeat S, D2, > m:Robe 500, Ondas?). > > Ports that lack even basic functionality shouldn't be mentioned on the > front page (and will be covered by the link to the TargetStatus page > anyway). > > In this way the user's expectation (and level of support they can > expect) decreases naturally in each tier.
Hi everyone, I was about to suggest exactly the same thing after reading the beginning of the discussion. I think this is an easier way of classifying targets, mainly because it doesn't imply the need to define a precise set of criteria. It also leaves room for the user to appreciate what he wants. What I particularly dislike in the current classification is the term "unusable", which sounds far too negative IMO. For example the Gigabeat S is far from unusable once you get past the hurdle of getting Rockbox onto it. Just my two cents. Nicolas
