On Wednesday, 18. June 2014 09:02:15 Peter wrote: > On 18. 6. 2014 8:51, Jonathan Gordon wrote: > > On 18 June 2014 16:25, Thomas Martitz <ku...@rockbox.org > > > > <mailto:ku...@rockbox.org>> wrote: > > I think we should still have a formal freeze period with RC builds. > > There are some open bugs that we can address too, perhaps. Alex is > > inactive so I don't think we have a release manager. > > > > Considering the state of the project (activity definitely seems low > > generally - just look at http://www.rockbox.org/since-4weeks.html) I > > think a freeze period is a waste of time. If someone is interested in > > freezing I would suggest just picking a commit and tagging it. > > I think that short freeze period is fine, for localizers who may want to > update translations. i will post slovak lang update during this week. > Btw thanks for this flash of life in this project, Rockbox is really > great software and I am happy that it still lives.
I'm also happy to do a N900 and OpenPandora release once we reach a final state. A short code freeze period is nice for the devs since it gives them a bit of time to test it in daily use (at least speaking for me ;)). Cheers, Thomas
